researching and telling the history of the built environment

Schlagwort: Spa Culture

»Das Regionale konstruieren. Formen und Funktionen von Heimatschutz-, Reform- und vernakulärer Architektur« (Vienna, November 26, 2021)

Interdisciplinary workshop by the Austrian Academy of Sciences and the Research Unit Art History, Technical University Vienna

In den letzten Jahren fand eine intensive Beschäftigung mit dem Phänomen des Regionalen (der Heimatschutz- bzw. Reformarchitektur, der Volkskunst, der Folklore, des Vernakulären, des „Elementaren“, des „Authentischen“ etc.) von Seiten der Kunstgeschichte und Architekturwissenschaft statt. Mittlerweile verfügen wir über eine breite Wissensbasis zu den ideologischen und historischen Kontexten dieser heterogenen, aber eng miteinander verflochtenen Strömungen, ihren Akteuren und Prozessen in der Schweiz, Deutschland, Österreich, Großbritannien und den skandinavischen Ländern. Dennoch sind weiterhin eine Reihe von offenen Fragen zu konstatieren, die insbesondere die sozio-ökonomischen, die medialen und architekturtheoretischen sowie die politisch-administrativen Facetten der regional-gebundenen Architektur um 1900 betreffen.

Der Workshop, eine Kooperation von ÖAW/IHB und dem Forschungsbereich Kunstgeschichte der TU Wien, nimmt dies zum Anlass und setzt sich anhand spezifischer Fallbeispiele mit der Bedeutung des Regional-Begriffs in der Architektur in der zweiten Hälfte des 19. und des frühen 20. Jahrhunderts auseinander: Tourismus- und Gesundheitsunternehmungen (Kurorte und Sommerfrischen), Staatsverwaltung (Arbeiter*innensiedlungen, Flüchtlingslager) und Architekturtheorie (Kleinwohnhaus). Als inhaltliche Klammern werden zum einen der Bezug auf die Region bzw. auf das regionale Bauen als auch die zugrunde liegenden, konstruierten Vorstellungen von „Land“ und „Landschaft“ dienen. Die architektonischen und städtebaulichen Überlegungen, die zur medialen Verbreitung von bestimmten Vorstellungen von Region / regionalem Bauen führten, werden ebenso eine Rolle spielen. Schließlich werden die Differenzen zwischen der erfundenen / imaginierten und der tatsächlich vernakulären Architektur thematisiert, denn der ostentative Verweis auf die „lokale Baugeschichte“ war allen genannten Bereichen immanent.

In der Zeit der Entwicklung von Nationalstaatsideen und konkurrierenden Zentralstaatsgedanken sowie der Entdeckung des „Lands“ (oder der Landschaft) im Interesse des einsetzenden Tourismus, war der Bezug auf die Region vielfältig konnotiert und die Architektur in ein dichtes semantisches Netz eingespannt. Es gilt, diese Bedeutungsebenen kritisch zu hinterfragen und die Funktion des Regionalen in den beispielhaft gewählten Kontexten zu untersuchen.

Concept: Dr. Richard Kurdiovsky (ÖAW), Dr. Oliver Sukrow (TU Wien)

Link: https://www.oeaw.ac.at/detail/news/das-regionale-konstruieren

»Designing Hygiea (Benjamin Ward Richardson, 1876) – Architecture, Urbanism, and the Sanitized City in 19th-century Central Europe« (Vienna, October 1, 2020)

Interdisciplinary workshop by the Austrian Academy of Sciences, ICOMOS Austria, and the Austrian Federal Ministry for Arts, Culture, the Civil Service and Sport

In the course of Vienna‘s emergence as a modern metropolis in the second half of the 19th century, critical questions regarding the health and hygienic living conditions of its inhabitants became more widely known to experts as well as to a broader public. Influenced by progress in the natural sciences and medicine, and particularly by the “Viennese Medical School”, the fields of medicine, architecture and urban planning intersected at this time in Vienna. Up until now, the main focus of work in the history of science has been on the training and development of expert medical knowledge after the Josephinian reforms of the Enlightenment, and references to architecture and urban planning have been infrequent. On the other hand, work in the history of 19th century architecture only rarely addresses medical issues, or the influence of medical developments on architectural design. Nevertheless, the problem of “healthy” or “hygienic” space was linked to urban planning and architectural considerations at an early point. For example, the doctor Carl Böhm developed a remarkable ventilation system for the Court Opera, whose principle was adopted by many public buildings on the Ringstrasse. Similarly, issues of health and hygiene influenced the building regulations of 1868, as well as Eugen Faßbender‘s regulatory plan for Vienna from 1893. While in Vienna living in the suburbs or the countryside during the summer had been firmly established since the 18th century, the subsequent expansion of the city due to industrialisation and population growth led to new forms of health oriented accommodation outside the city (the “Sommerfrische” [summer resort]). Certain regions such as the Semmering or the Wienerwald were structured and architecturally designed as “health landscapes,” and consumed as such through the media. On the one hand, these places marked a move outward from the city, but on the other they were closely interwoven with it (eg., the users, architects and operators of the sanatoriums in Purkersdorf or Pernitz [Sanatorium Wienerwald]), and so also had an inward effect on Viennese discussions about health and hygiene. There was then, a reciprocal relationship between the urban representation and use of architecture, and ideas of hygiene that emerged in the countryside around Vienna. In addition, these health spots in and around Vienna utilised various architectural modes depending on their target audience, and were employed in different ways depending on the social class of their guests.

In addition to discussing concrete architectural manifestations of ideas about hygiene such as sanatoriums, hospital buildings, mental asylums, baths, etc., we will also discuss the spatial and regional context in and around Vienna in which a topography of health developed (river baths in the Danube wetlands, Kursalon on the Glacis, hospital facilities on the slopes of the Vienna Woods, etc.). Since these places have often been transformed and are no longer perceptible, the workshop will also contribute to an archaeology of ideas of health and hygiene in 19th century Vienna. The workshop will discuss both the complex relationship between the built environment and ideas of hygiene in the second half of the 19th century and its methodology. While Vienna and Austria are the focus of the workshop, they will be contextualized by international perspectives on other cities.

Concept: Dr. Richard Kurdiovsky (ÖAW), Dr. Oliver Sukrow (TU Wien)

Link: https://www.oeaw.ac.at/fileadmin/Institute/INZ/img/forschung/Kunstgeschichte/Designing_Hygiea_eng.pdf

Botstiber Institute for Austrian-American Studies Research Grant

»Alternative Spaces of Innovation. A Comparative Study of 19th-Century Spa Towns as Regional Innovation Clusters«

I received a BIAAS grant for my Postdoc research project “Alternative Spaces of Innovation. A Comparative Study of 19th-Century Spa Towns as Regional Innovation Clusters.”

This interdisciplinary project aims from a historical-comparative perspective at exploring how 19th-century spa towns in Austria and California became regional innovation clusters. The project argues that innovation in 19th-century Austria and California also occurred in ‘alternative’ spaces such as spa towns.

I am particularly interested in exploring which architectural and cultural strategies were employed in order to re-design the natural conditions in and around 19th-century spa towns as landscapes of health in which new relationships between humans, landscapes, and cure were architecturally framed.

Project duration: September 2020–December 2021

https://botstiberbiaas.org/avada_portfolio/oliver-sukrow-alternative-spaces-of-innovation-a-comparative-study-of-19th-century-spa-towns-as-regional-innovation-clusters/

Emil Ritter von Förster (1838–1909), Entwurf »Casinopark Marienbad«, 1875, in: Allgemeine Bauzeitung, 40.1875, S. 75.

Seminar »Landscapes of Health in Vienna around 1900. Architectures and Spaces of Convalescence«

Joint Seminar of TU Wien and BOKU Wien focusses on the production of »healthy spaces«

Update July 2020: We published a booklet on the seminar’s topics (https://kunstgeschichte.tuwien.ac.at/wp-content/uploads/Wiener-Gesundheitslandschaften-und-Architekturen-der-Genesung-um-1900.pdf)!

Update March 2020: We moved the whole seminar into the digital space!

In the summer term 2020, this joint seminar is devoted to Viennese landscapes of health around 1900. Through the study of prominent examples of architecture and landscape design for recovery, we explore a specific look at the history of architecture in Vienna. We examine the development of different health and architecture concepts that were always closely interwoven with social changes and at the same time reflect technological and scientific progress. We aim for an overview of the architectural and historical development of Viennese health architecture and landscape design around 1900. By analyzing selected buildings, participants should learn to research building history, to grasp the typology of the respective building, to think about materials, construction, and equipment and to describe it with the correct architectonic terms. The history of the healthy landscape is revealed through the history of the hospital as a building type and through landscape design, which is why both will be contextualized and studied.

A collaboration of the Institute for Landscape Architecture (ILA) of the University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, and the Research Unit Art History of the Technical University Vienna.

Staff:

Dipl.-Ing. Dr.nat.techn. Ulrike Krippner

Maria Harmann, BSc.

Univ.Ass. Dr.phil. Oliver Sukrow, M.A.